Eight Introductory Lessons / 06
Judgements and Line Statements
Each hexagram has a judgement; each line has its own statement. Learn what these texts are and which one to read.
- Tell a judgement apart from a line statement.
- Know that the Ten Wings are later commentary, not the original text.
- State which passage the common convention selects, based on how many lines move.
Two kinds of text
The original text attached to a hexagram comes in two kinds.
The judgement: one passage for the whole hexagram, speaking about it as a whole. The judgement of hexagram 17, Following, reads "Following. Supreme success. Perseverance furthers. No blame." There are sixty-four of them.
Line statements: one passage per line, each speaking about that line. The statement for the bottom line of Following reads "Nine in the first place: the standard is changing. Perseverance brings good fortune. To go out of the door with results brings achievement." Sixty-four hexagrams times six lines gives three hundred and eighty-four.
In addition, Qian and Kun each carry one extra passage, used only when all six lines move. Altogether that makes four hundred and fifty passages of original text.
Keep the text and its commentary apart
Open any edition and you will find, alongside the judgements and line statements, texts called the Tuan, the Xiang, the Wenyan and others. Together these are the Ten Wings: commentary written later to explain the earlier text.
The distinction matters in practice. The judgements and line statements are what is being explained; the Tuan and Xiang are one way of explaining them. Reading the two as a single block makes it easy to mistake one school's account for what the original text says.
The hexagram library in this app keeps the original text, the classical commentary and the modern plain-language explanation in separate fields, so that the line stays visible.
Which passage to read
A hexagram carries a judgement plus six line statements, and you do not read all of them every time. The usual approach is to let the number of moving lines decide which passage is the main one. The scheme below was set out by Zhu Xi in the Yixue Qimeng, and is the one this app follows:
No moving line: read the judgement of the primary hexagram. One: read that line's statement in the primary hexagram. Two: read both line statements in the primary hexagram, with the upper one as the main text. Three: read the judgements of both hexagrams, with the primary one as the main text. Four: read the statements of the two unmoving lines in the resulting hexagram, with the lower one as the main text. Five: read the statement of the single unmoving line in the resulting hexagram. Six: read the judgement of the resulting hexagram — unless the primary hexagram is Qian or Kun, in which case read their extra passage.
One tendency is visible: when little moves you stay with the primary hexagram, and when a lot moves the weight shifts to the resulting one.
There is more than one scheme
The scheme above is widely transmitted, but it is one systematisation rather than the single accepted reading. Other positions exist across the tradition — always starting from the judgement, or giving precedence to one particular line — each with its own reasoning.
This app picks one scheme and names its source so that every displayed result can be checked. That is not a claim that other readings are wrong. If you follow a different scheme, you are not being less orthodox.
What matters is knowing which scheme you are using, and staying consistent with it.
Try it yourself
This lesson has a hands-on exercise. It is built into the Traditional Chinese lesson page, where you can try it straight away: open the interactive exercise.